Staff Report | Lifeline

Role Play

Justin Pizzala

In a new study, Italian scientists say televisions in the bedroom
can severely decrease the frequency of sex between couples.

No easy solution to television dilemma

I don’t need a certified sexologist to report that having a
television in the bedroom is not conducive to romance.

Everyone should know the boob tube has always been a source of
disagreement between people, especially couples. And we all know that
if couples are disagreeing in the bedroom, it’s going to be a lonely
night for someone.

Television related arguments immediately start between people vying
for the all-powerful remote control. Each partner knows that without
the remote they are powerless to their significant other’s inadequate
channel surfing speed and volume control.

Whoever doesn’t end up with the clicker then starts in on their
partner for the choices they make, like stopping at the Girls Gone Wild
infomercial, or in a woman’s case, a Bowflex ad.

But the real confrontation occurs once the program is decided upon.
Simply put, today’s TV is too derisive between men and women.

For example, what is the reasoning behind the Lifetime channel? To
portray the message that all men are evil and can’t be trusted.

But the man-hating hasn’t stopped there. Network syndicated shows
like “The View” and “Dr. Phil” all stress that men need to be more
committed to listening to their partner’s feelings. If a women hears
this message, the remainder of night the man will be forced to connect
emotionally, not physically to their partner.

To be fair, I suppose their are a few “man shows” on TV that
objectify women.

The difference between these two is that watching scantally clad
girls on trampolines is light-hearted and shouldn’t be taken as
offensive.

Mostly though, if a man had his way he would probably want to settle
down and watch some sports before he calls it a night. But for some
reason, watching athletics on TV is a hot-button issue for some women.

So what can men and women agree to watch late at night? Well, the
news if fairly gender neutral, but not exactly exciting.

Also the constant stories about violence and tragedy taking place
all over the world doesn’t exactly put someone in the proverbial mood.

But if you already have a TV there and are hoping to get lucky, hide
the remote.

You don’t want to end up watching Lifetime, or even worse, sports.

Phil Wagner can be reached at news2@cm-life.com.


Is it really the TV set? Probably not

Can a television in the bedroom really be to blame for a diminishing
sex life?

According to Serenella Salomoni, Italian sexologist, that can very
well be the case for some couples.

While the study conducted in Italy did pique my interest, it also
raised some questions as to the direct correlation of the
two.

According to Salomoni, if there is no television in the bedroom, the
frequency of sexual intercourse doubles.

My first thought was that the study focused solely on couples having
sex in the bedroom.

It seems to me that to have a fulfilling and frequent sex life,
there needs to be the element of spontaneity or sex outside of the
bedroom.

Although this may not always be an easy thing to attain, I feel that
the work spontaneity requires could be an important aspect in improving
a couple’s relationship.

This was not my only hesitation with the study.

The team of psychologists involved with the study questioned 523
Italian couples to see how a TV affected their sex life.

Those who did not have a TV reported having sex twice a week or
eight times a month, while those with a TV dropped to merely four times
a month, according to the study.

My next question deals with outside factors: Is it the TV that makes
people not have sex or are there other relationship problems that
interfere with their sex life?

It often seems that some relationships and sex lives suffer from
working too much, different schedules and exhaustion.

Although I do understand that many people like to channel surf
before falling asleep, I wonder just how hard it is to click the “off”
button and change up the routine.

Or is it possible that the TV is superior to us? Now that
could be a good study.

Elly Johnson can be reached at photo@cm-life.com.

E-mail the author: defaultuser

Leave a Reply

Central Michigan Life encourages those who wish to leave comments, questions or feedback to do so here. Any posts with profanity, excessive defamation or other questionable language are subject to removal at the discretion of CM Life. Direct all questions regarding this policy to the Editor in Chief.

Follow Us

Advertise Here
Advertise Here

Facebook

What We're Reading

Philadelphia Inquirer

College students arrested for not paying tip

Brian Manzullo: Headline says it all. "You can't give us terrible, terrible service and expect a tip."  
TechCrunch

Paul Carr Debates Jeff Jarvis About So-Called Citizen Journalists

Brian Manzullo: A debate on citizen journalism after the coverage from Fort Hood. Real good listen.  
The New York Times

Prosecutors Turn Tables on Student Journalists - NYTimes.com

David Veselenak: A class that has real-world implications is facing real-world problems. Lawyers for a man convicted from the work of the Medill Innocence Project at Northwestern University are asking for the syllabus, grades and e-mail messages between the students.  

See more recommended links!

  • Popular
  • Latest
  • Comments
  • Tags
  • Subscribe

Text Alerts

Phone number

Carrier

*Standard text messaging rates may apply from your carrier*