Staff Report | Editorial

No new primary

If politicians are to be held responsible for their decisions, they need to start with the state and the party level. The party leaders who pushed the early vote weren’t ignorant of the rules, in fact they wrote them.

Now they aren’t willing to pay the consequences. Voters had their say, they did their part. It is the Democratic party that is disenfranchised, not the voters.

If Michigan wants a redo on its primary election, there has to be a reason. So far, no one has one.

People from all across America have been telling Michigan their votes didn’t count. Those who wanted Barack Obama or John Edwards to be the Democratic nominee didn’t get to pick either name, but were told to vote “uncommitted” by their top supporters.

Obama and Edwards chose to remove their name from the ballot. Hillary Clinton chose to be on the ballot.

Yes, Clinton broke the rules in Michigan, but Obama and Edwards had the same decision to make in Florida and decided to keep their names on the ballot there, just like Clinton.

Florida was too important a state to abide by party principles, but Michigan was not.

Obama and Edwards supporters had a way to vote for their candidates and many did – an unprecedented 40 percent voted uncommitted in Michigan. Certainly, the numbers show that many voters stayed home instead of going out to vote in what they considered an illegitimate vote.

Such behavior was hardly unique to that election and while significant lack of interest amongst voters should be cause for a revote, it isn’t in this case. Any threshold set in the middle of an election is extremely suspect.

Even the suggested alternatives aren’t acceptable; mail-in ballots frequently don’t reach poor and minority voters. Caucuses are an even worse solution that only work for those without night jobs or school and with child care and enough interest (and free time) to spend a few hours getting badgered by know-it-alls. Neither is as valid as the current primary.

The last solution, another primary, has an estimated $10 million cost. The other hurdles are easier; getting both camps to sign off on any plans and generating enough public interest.

Taxpayers should not pay for a political party gamble,

State and national parties won’t pay for it, neither Obama nor Hillary can pay for it without the other.

Because of the time it takes to prepare and the legislature’s upcoming spring break, any changes will happen in the next week.

One solution is to use the January results and count them as half the weight, which would dilute the vote and hold the Michigan Democratic Party responsible for their thoughtful decision.

E-mail the author: defaultuser

Leave a Reply

Central Michigan Life encourages those who wish to leave comments, questions or feedback to do so here. Any posts with profanity, excessive defamation or other questionable language are subject to removal at the discretion of CM Life. Direct all questions regarding this policy to the Editor in Chief.

Follow Us

Advertise Here
Advertise Here

Facebook

What We're Reading

Philadelphia Inquirer

College students arrested for not paying tip

Brian Manzullo: Headline says it all. "You can't give us terrible, terrible service and expect a tip."  
TechCrunch

Paul Carr Debates Jeff Jarvis About So-Called Citizen Journalists

Brian Manzullo: A debate on citizen journalism after the coverage from Fort Hood. Real good listen.  
The New York Times

Prosecutors Turn Tables on Student Journalists - NYTimes.com

David Veselenak: A class that has real-world implications is facing real-world problems. Lawyers for a man convicted from the work of the Medill Innocence Project at Northwestern University are asking for the syllabus, grades and e-mail messages between the students.  

See more recommended links!

  • Popular
  • Latest
  • Comments
  • Tags
  • Subscribe

Text Alerts

Phone number

Carrier

*Standard text messaging rates may apply from your carrier*