Staff Report | Editorial

Gen Ed options

The Academic Senate acted appropriately by rescinding the DeJong Amendment.

The amendment, which would have placed an initial 100-course cap on the University Program, was a step in the wrong direction.

Providing a strict course cap may allow departments to better focus on ensuring their general education courses meet the objectives of the program.

But the cost comes from the students, not the departments – the DeJong Amendment would have greatly limited course options.

The University Program, which now has roughly 200 courses within it, provides respectable breadth for students. Narrowing this scope is not necessarily a wise decision.

For students to gain something from their general education, they need to be genuinely interested in the courses they are taking.

Capping the number of courses within the University Program, thereby severely limiting students’ options to meet their general education requirements, runs the danger of being self-defeating. By having significantly fewer options, more students will be forced into classes through which they would much rather sleep.

This is not unreasonable apathy on students’ part; rather, students should be able to find UP courses in which they have a genuine interest. A strict course cap reduces the likelihood that this occurs.

The A-Senate should take this into account as it proceeds. The Hartshorne/Stecker Plan addresses general education concerns but does not have anywhere near such stark limitations.

The Hartshorne/Stecker Plan, among other things, proposes to limit courses in the University Program to only those that broadly represent the analytic methodology – rather than only the content – of a discipline. This comes without a specific course-count cap, and after revision no longer includes a course-level cap.

This fits the mission of a strong general education program. Departments and the A-Senate now need to work toward providing as many courses as possible that introduce students to a discipline’s methods. As methodology rather than particular content weighs heaviest, departments still may be able to provide a wide range of courses better tailored to operating within the UP.

Senators and departments need to be mindful that, although the UP should include only specific courses, the UP should have as wide a range as possible. To the contrary of the DeJong Amendment, senators should work toward including more, rather than fewer, courses, so long as they meet requirements.

For a general education model to be effective, it has to be flexible. The Hartshorne/Stecker Plan can allow this, but only if senators work toward it.

E-mail the author: defaultuser

Leave a Reply

Central Michigan Life encourages those who wish to leave comments, questions or feedback to do so here. Any posts with profanity, excessive defamation or other questionable language are subject to removal at the discretion of CM Life. Direct all questions regarding this policy to the Editor in Chief.

Follow Us

Advertise Here
Advertise Here

Facebook

What We're Reading

Philadelphia Inquirer

College students arrested for not paying tip

Brian Manzullo: Headline says it all. "You can't give us terrible, terrible service and expect a tip."  
TechCrunch

Paul Carr Debates Jeff Jarvis About So-Called Citizen Journalists

Brian Manzullo: A debate on citizen journalism after the coverage from Fort Hood. Real good listen.  
The New York Times

Prosecutors Turn Tables on Student Journalists - NYTimes.com

David Veselenak: A class that has real-world implications is facing real-world problems. Lawyers for a man convicted from the work of the Medill Innocence Project at Northwestern University are asking for the syllabus, grades and e-mail messages between the students.  

See more recommended links!

  • Popular
  • Latest
  • Comments
  • Tags
  • Subscribe

Text Alerts

Phone number

Carrier

*Standard text messaging rates may apply from your carrier*