Staff Report | Editorial

Transparency costs

It’s a good idea, but now may not be the time.

Michigan House Republicans are seeking Gov. Jennifer Granholm’s support for legislation to increase financial transparency on the Michigan.gov Web site.

Transparency is a good thing. Michigan’s Web site includes only financial information from the past fiscal year, and funding is split only into broad categories.

However, state estimates place the price tag near $100 million.

State House Republicans dispute the figure, contending that numerous software companies offer free upgrades for local governments.

The catch is, Michigan would require not only software upgrades but substantial hardware improvements.

Kurt Weiss, spokesman for the Department of Information Technology, said Michigan officials met with technology officials from other states, and none were aware of an adequate free transition system.

Though state officials should work toward a long-term transition, seeking low-cost opportunities as they arise, the benefit of the upgrade does not now warrant the cost.

House Republicans ought to be skeptical of the Department of Information Technology’s price estimate, but they should also take seriously the significant upgrades that would be required. It’s unlikely that a technology specialist would so grossly overestimate costs.

Michigan’s computer system is 20 years old. An upgrade to an Internet-based accountability system would require more than courtesy software. Compatibility issues would abound.

Transparency should be a priority, but it cannot eclipse what the state should be transparent about – expenditures in worthwhile programs, from Medicaid to education.

Right now, upgrading Michigan’s system would divert $100 million – or some other large amount of money – from the programs that matter most in improving citizens’ lives, even if those citizens cannot as closely track their government.

The extent to which it would benefit the state does not outweigh the opportunities that would be missed. The funding could go toward education, toward roads – even toward more tax cuts.

The current system provides a reasonable level of transparency. Of course it could be improved. Missouri’s searchable database runs circles around Michigan’s online system.

But dealing with a tight budget requires putting in place priorities. A $100 million Web site upgrade, though nice, cannot be one of them.

That said, Republicans and Democrats should continue working on legislation designed to promote transparency, so long as costs remain reasonable.

E-mail the author: defaultuser

This post was written by:

defaultuser - who has written 23358 posts on Central Michigan Life.




Leave a Reply

Central Michigan Life encourages those who wish to leave comments, questions or feedback to do so here. Any posts with profanity, excessive defamation or other questionable language are subject to removal at the discretion of CM Life. Direct all questions regarding this policy to the Editor in Chief.

Follow Us

(Sports)
Advertise Here
Advertise Here

Facebook

Overheard @ CMU

Hear something funny on campus? Want to share it with other readers? Click here to fill out the form! We will select our favorite entries for publishing on Page A2 of our print edition.

What We're Reading

Advertising Age

Consumers Trust Their Friends Less

Brian Manzullo: People need to hear/see things in multiple places in order to "believe" it. This story says five, but even two could work.  
Mashable

World’s Longest-Married Couple to Answer Your Romantic Queries Via Twitte

David Veselenak: Who says you can teach an old dog new tricks?They've been married since 1924, which makes it 86 years.  
Read Write Web

5 Reasons to Wait for iPad 2.0

Brian Manzullo: This is how Apple works - iPod and iPhone were flawed when they first came out. Wait for 2nd or 3rd gen iPad and you won't be sorry.  

See more recommended links!

Text Alerts

Phone number

Carrier

*Standard text messaging rates may apply from your carrier*