Home » News »

Minors are accountable for breaking the law, even when they need medical attention

 
email

The state House of Representatives recently approved the medical amnesty bill, exempting minors from liquor violations if they turn themselves or a friend into a hospital from alcohol abuse. Lawmakers are concerned that many minors don’t call for help for fear of legal repercussions. The bill will have to pass through the state Senate in order to become a law.

The medical amnesty bill should not be approved by the state Senate. Minors who drink run the risk of facing health problems and should have to face the consequences if rushed to the hospital.

Even though the drinking age is set at 21, many minors choose to drink, especially in a college town like Mount Pleasant. Sometimes, minors drink in excess. The cause may be from the thrill of doing something illegal or peer pressure from others. Whatever the reason, minors may experience alcohol poison and may need medical attention.

Just because a minor is rushed to the emergency room, however, does not mean they should be immune to the law. Minors know they run the risk of getting a MIP every time they drink, even if they never enter a hospital. In a time when the state economy is doing terrible, the money generated from MIPs is crucial and should not be taken away.

Approving the bill would only encourage underage drinking. If the ambulance isn’t called when a minor drinks too much, it can result in death. Those around the minor will face far worse consequences if they let a friend die instead of caring and actually calling 9-1-1 when it is needed.

At 18 or 19-years-old, it isn’t unbearable to wait until the age of 21 to legally drink. A 21-year-old is far more mature than an 18 or 19 year old, even though they are only separated by a few years. Those of age are more likely to control their drinking habits than a teenager who just started drinking.

There’s a reason why the drinking age is 21, and minors need to respect it.

Minors should not be drinking in any instance. They know it is illegal and should face all consequences that come with it.

 
 
  • Joe

    Well written, but terrible article. While I completely agree that minors shouldn’t drink, we know what is really going to happen. If someone passes out and is nearly dead, their best friend shouldn’t have to worry about calling a ambulance because they are drunk! Lets be realistic.

  • http://lewbryson.blogspot.com LewBryson

    That’s pretty harsh. Reminds me of the Prohibitionists who favored taking the POISON and skull-and-crossbones warnings off drums of wood alcohol in the 1920s so that people who just saw “alcohol” and drank it would face the full consequences of breaking the law.

    “A 21-year-old is far more mature than an 18 or 19 year old, even though they are only separated by a few years.” But a 21 year old is not that much more mature than someone whose 21st birthday is next week, are they? Still illegal. The idea of two ‘ages of maturity’ — 18, when you can vote, marry, buy property, and so on, and then 21, when you can finally drink — is not just a bad idea, it’s confusing, a mixed message.

  • Chris

    The medical amnesty bill is a good idea.