Home » Voices » Editorial »

Department chairs and faculty have weak arguments against grade distribution

 
email

Various department chairs at Central Michigan University are urging the removal of grade distribution information from the university Portal Web site.

Chairs are afraid that students will sign up for the easiest classes, which will pressure the entire faculty to go easy on students.

This is nothing more than a weak attempt to deflect judgment on the faculty’s teaching methods, keeping students in the dark on what classes are like with certain teachers.

The department chairs need to worry about maintaining quality teachers, not how grade distributions will affect registration for classes.

Access to grade distribution is already easy, thanks to the Internet. The University of Indiana allows its students to be specific when checking grade distribution, breaking it down by individual professors and certain semesters. Pickaprof.com allows users to chronicle how professors at a variety of universities grade their students. Since grade distribution is public record, everyone has access to them.

But certain department chairs don’t want students looking these records up and are making sweeping generalizations about the easy access to grade distributions. The department of psychology chairman Hajime Otani fears that making the records easier to navigate through will cause students to “shop around” for easy classes, and that academic standards at CMU won’t be met.

If that’s the case, there’s a serious problem with the faculty at CMU.

All professors should be held to the same standard when it comes to teaching, which apparently is not happening at CMU. Students wouldn’t be able to shop around for easy teachers if the entire faculty had a universal scale for grading. But instead, there is a significant amount of disparity among professors on how grades are given out. The fear of grade distribution on Portal simply shows how inconsistent the faculty is when viewed as a whole.

Grade distribution is public record, therefore deflating any argument faculty may have. Even if the link was taken down, any student could go into the campus library and find out how harsh professors grade their students.

But most of the time, students don’t even concern themselves with looking up the records. Professors’ classes fill up based on reputation and word of mouth. An instructor’s ratings on Ratemyprofessor.com can make or break the enrollment in their classes.

If department chairs are really worried about students taking easy classes, they need to come down on lenient professors not up to standard instead of trying to deter students from looking up the records.

Professors on campus can’t hide facts, nor can they try to bury them.

 
 
  • http://www.koofers.com Koofers

    Koofers.com also has an interesting and helpful way of displaying Grade Distribution Data

  • Antonio

    A professor who has no worries about this accessable grade distribution is a professor who realizes knowledge and quality teaching doesn’t come from multiple choice tests most likely provided by textbook companies who got the questions written by a guy named Apu from India. I don’t want to hear anymore complaining from professors. The most useful classes I’ve had at this school didn’t even have tests…but they did have one thing…a big picture to take home and remember after the class is over. Imagine that!

  • cmuperson

    “Chairs are afraid that students will sign up for the easiest classes, which will pressure the entire faculty to go easy on students. This is nothing more than a weak attempt to deflect judgment on the faculty’s teaching methods, keeping students in the dark on what classes are like with certain teachers.”

    How does grade data tell you anything about teaching methods? So how does keeping grade data off the portal deflect judgment about teaching methods? I don’t get it.

    The editorial notes that the grade distribution info is available in other places. Right. So what’s so bad about having it not be on the portal?

    The argument that the profs are making is that putting the info on the portal on the same page as the course search link sends the message that it’s OK to shop for the easiest course. They are not arguing that the info should be secret, just that the main academic page of the portal is the wrong place for it.

    Also, the editorial calls the faculty arguments “weak.” But why doesn’t CM Life publish the actual letter that the profs sent? Then people can judge for themselves what the arguments are, instead of just taking CM Life’s word for it? Otherwise, they are just saying that the profs sent this letter and it has weak arguments without letting people see what is actually in the letter.

  • mossdale

    Frankly, if posting grade distributions and SOS scores is going to keep people out of my classes that only want an easy grade — I say, fine, post them. I don’t want those students in my classes anyway.

    Ratemyprofessor.com does not make or break classes anywhere. That comment makes me laugh.