Home » News » Metro »

Lawsuit could expand tribal boundaries; half of Mount Pleasant at stake

 
email

An ongoing lawsuit against the state could shake up the boundaries of Mount Pleasant and surrounding areas in the coming months.

Originally filed by the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe against the state in 2005, the suit considers historic reservation boundaries and the tribe’s ability to exercise its power within. It is scheduled to be heard Aug. 10 in U.S. District Court in Bay City.

According to the tribe, the lawsuit stems from concerns it has with governing its people. But all local leaders agree the logistics will take a long time to sort through.

“It was brought about to protect out tribal boundaries and exercise our sovereignty while protecting tribal members,” said Frank Cloutier, the tribe’s interim public relations director.

If the tribe succeeds, the reservation’s boundaries would include half of Union and Chippewa townships, and all of Deerfield, Isabella, Nottawa, Denver and Wise townships. It would include half of Mount Pleasant, with everything north of High Street becoming tribal land.

A change in the reservation boundaries would not result in new taxes for non-tribal members, Cloutier said, as the tribe would lack the jurisdiction to do so.

What does it mean?

It is still unknown what the ramifications would mean for the city of Mount Pleasant and area townships.

“When I say nobody’s really sure what that means, I’m not hedging — that’s just truth,” City Manager Kathie Grinzinger said. “No one really knows if that means that local ordinances would still be the implementing ordinance or if the tribe’s zoning or planning or ordinance would supercede those.”

The tribe and federal government are in mediation with the state to settle the issue before the trial. Mediation will continue until the trial at the court’s recommendation.

Cloutier said the tribe is trying to resolve taxation and child welfare issues on tribal members through the lawsuit.

“We’re not looking to increase our square footage,” he said. “It’s not an issue of making the reservation bigger.”

The lawsuit also would affect Union Township, which could be split with everything north of Remus Road becoming tribal land.

Supervisor John Barker said he is not too worried.

“There is potential that half of Union Township could be affected by the decision. What the ultimate effect is remains to be seen,” he said. “I can’t say it’s one of the highest items on my agenda.”

 
 
  • johnny

    If this happens, I’m out….it’s bad enough as it is!

  • Associate Grand Wizzard of Isabella County

    Does this mean I’ll be subject to tribal law if I attend CMU and live in Copper Beach?

  • Rick

    “We’re not looking to increase our square footage,” he said. “It’s not an issue of making the reservation bigger.” ……Right buddy!Unbelievable! Can one group become any greedier?

  • http://jfbark3@att.net jim Bark

    HOW MUCH MONEY DO THESE NATIVE aMERICAN’S NEED? iN THE 1880′S MY gREAT gRANDFATHER jAMES fITZPATRICK IN rOSEBUSH BOUGHT ACRAGE FROM THE INDIANS-do they get that back. Hey they lost the war. LET THEM READ REAL ESTATE LAW. iF SOMEONE MAINTAINS AND PAYS THE TAXES ON A PIECE OF PROPERTY FOR LONGER THAN 5-7 YEARS THEY OWN IT!1OO YEARS LATER THE iNDIAN WANT IT BACK. i DON’T THINK SO- They lost the war.LIVE WITH IT. DEAL WITH IT AND QUIT YOUR CHEATING , LYING , STEALING AND WHINING!!!!!!!!!

  • 912

    Ryan-

    You raise the question, “What does it mean?,” but you never answer it.

    What is an “implementing ordinance,” and what would it mean if a local ordinance no longer qualifies as such? What does Cloutier mean when he says “the tribe is trying to resolve taxation and child welfare issues on tribal members through the lawsuit”? How would this action do that, and why should thousands of others be affected simply so the tribe can resolve these issues?

    Lots of questions here.

  • http://cm-life.com David

    After all of these years they now are trying to get the total amount that my grandmother fought for. The tribe as it stands dose not deserve to gain anymore property. When they wont reconize the familt of the one who fought for what they have now, and for the way they treat the swan creek black river people.

  • Tyananicole1992

    Indian Land is Indian Land, and will always be INDIAN LAND. WHo was here first?. yeah that's right we were. Indian Country belongs to Indians. && If anyone is “cheating” it was the greedy Europeans who decided to kill innocent women and children so they can claim land that was NEVER their land. && Natives back in the 1880's had no choice but to sell land, the BIA controlled the Indians and their land. We as Indigenous people were treated unfairly, and like DIRT. If anyone deserves land back it is the NATIVE PEOPLE. Get over yourself, and come to realize that all the land your on right now IS NATIVE LAND AND WILL ALWAYS BE NATIVE LAND.