Home » Voices » Editorial »

Athletics Department will destroy attendance if students charged a fee to see a game

 

The Central Michigan University Athletics Department is facing tough budget cuts — much like other departments.

But in an attempt to raise revenue, Athletics Director Dave Heeke has suggested charging students a fee to attend all games and athletic events as a possibility.

Charging students to attend sporting events should be used only as a last resort — only after the Athletics Department has made as many necessary cuts as possible. You would think with a budget of $21,907,364, the Athletics Department would have more than enough funding for students to go to the games for free. Students will scoff when they are asked to fork over $10 to see a football game when the department is spending $5,875,725 for administrative salaries and $4,872,357 for scholarships.

You expect a lot of students, who are the majority of the fan base, that are wondering where they will scrounge up money for their next meal and books for classes, to pay to see a sporting event? Good luck.

Other public universities around the state can afford to charge students for tickets. Michigan State University and University of Michigan have the advantage of an extensive fan base that goes beyond their universities, allowing them to make millions off of ticket revenue. CMU only has its 20,000 or so students and the residents of Mount Pleasant, a fan base hardly big enough to reach a significant profit.

The Athletics Department has not necessarily been wise with how it has been spending money this academic year. Back in August, the department spent $500,000 on FieldTurf for the Indoor Athletic Department’s turf bay — a practice facility for most athletes. Was that a necessary purchase when a total like that could have been used elsewhere?

Two of CMU’s big selling points for prospective students were the CMU Promise and the free sporting events. With the Promise disbanded, the free games remain as one of the last advantages that Central has in attracting students. Forcing students to pay to see a football game will deteriorate both game attendance and school enrollment.

At the very least, if the Athletic Department is insistent on charging students to see games, then it should be kept at a low price. Ticket prices should not be above $10 per game. Students also should be able to use their student I.D.’s to get into games and have it charged to their accounts, much like FLEX Dollars for the cafeteria.

But there should not be a reason why tickets cannot continue to be free.
The Athletics Department should look elsewhere for cuts — areas that are not as necessary.

 
 
  • Florence Schneider

    While I agree students should not be charged to attend athletic events at CMU, the editorial’s claim that new field turf in the indoor practice facility wasn’t necessary is nonsense.

    The previous playing surface in the indoor facility was more than 10-years-old. It was worn out and no longer safe.

    Unfortunately, artificial playing surfaces don’t last forever. Would the CM Life editorial board have preferred risking serious injury to a young athletes (i.e. Brian Pruit, 1994) due to a dangerous playing surface?

    Would the CM Life editorial board preferred boarding-up the indoor facility and not using it at all since its surface was unsafe?

    Due some cursory research before making complete and utter fools of yourselves! We don’t need lazy reporters coming out of CMU!

  • Joan McDonald

    Dear Editor in Chief,
    I am responding to your editorial regarding students and free tickets to Athletic Events. CMU is the only school we know of that still offers “free to student” tickets. How lucky you are to have this still in place. Would you not rather pay a small amount to attend an athletic event, than to have the program cut back because of lack of funds? My daughter-in-law received her MA from a big ten school in 2001. When she attended an event, she had to purchase her ticket, with real money. Football games were $25 per person, and that was the student rate. Please think this through….paying for your ticket could save a program.

  • Dustin

    Sorry Joann, but that is the dumbest thing I have ever heard. First off if you haven’t noticed Central Michigan is not a Big Ten school, second we do not play high caliber teams like Big Ten schools do. How many people are really excited to see CMU blow out Alcorn State? There is a very small fan base for Central Michigan and it is hard to even get 20,000 people in our stadium, remember Central has around 25,000 students. I love football and there is nothing I love more than watching CMU football, and I would pay the ticket prices. BUT, most students come to pre-game party, which has already been taken away. Why would any of these students pay to party when they can do it at home for free and unsupervised? The profit from student ticket sales would be so minimal it wouldn’t even matter, I guarantee it! Attendance would drop, because I can guarantee students would boycott games just like they did the tailgate. We would then risk losing division 1 status. That sounds to me to be a bit more of a risk. Over the last 2 years I have lost my Michigan Promise, Central Promise, that is a lot of money. This is all we students have left.

  • E

    I’m pretty sure “free entrance to games” is not CMU’s biggest selling point…..

  • Dustin

    To you maybe not, but it is something to consider for many students. The fact is everything adds up.

  • E

    Right, it’s “a” selling point but not “the” selling point. I mean, really, if that’s the “biggest selling point” then this school is in a lot more trouble than I thought. If the priorities of our prospective students are such that the determining factor comes down to the cost of admission to games, then we have definitely failed.

  • Dustin

    Ok E, No one ever said it was the biggest selling point. The article called it one of the big selling points, and I referred to it as the only promised item we have left. So I am not understanding where you are coming from.