Home » Voices » Editorial »

University president should not be given so much compensation amid budget cuts

 
email

George Ross will earn $400,000 in his first year once he assumes his position March 1 as university president.

This is a $47,443 pay increase over former university president Micheal Rao, who had been with Central Michigan University for eight years before leaving for the same position at Virginia Commonwealth University.With CMU’s budget in a crisis and Michigan’s economy continuing its struggles, it is difficult to justify paying Ross so much money in his first year at CMU.

The Board of Trustees would say Ross’ salary is comparable given inflation and necessary to bring in a qualified candidate. But the university is taking a risk in potentially overpaying someone who does not have years of experience to back such a high salary.

Ross’ previous experience as a university president consists only of his two-year term at Alcorn State University. Before that, he served as vice president of Finance and Administrative Services at CMU from December 2002 to March 2007.

But the issue goes beyond the salary. Besides having a university-provided house, Ross will receive $10,000 a year for furnishings, a bonus of up to 20 percent each year if performance goals are met and $16,500 a year for his retirement fund. How the Board of Trustees will go about evaluating which goals are met remains to be seen.

These perks, although not uncommon in a president’s salary package at other schools, could be trimmed to save the university money at a time when the budget is a concern. Taxpayers and students, who are already struggling, will bear the burden of paying for Ross’ contract.

Meanwhile, every entity on campus is getting nickle-and-dimed amid a tight budget. The math and writing centers — skills that are the backbone to a student’s education — could face reduced hours if funding is cut. Computer labs are no longer open 24 hours every day of the week to ensure every student can get their homework done.

Departments are to propose a plan by today that would cut either 3, 6 or 9 percent of their budget. All these reductions have an effect on students’ academic success. The administration defends these budget cuts by saying they are essential for CMU’s survival.

But what is more important? A fat paycheck for a president or intelligent students who can work to make the world a better place? The answer seems quite obvious at CMU.

The Board of Trustees should have kept Ross’ salary in the $300,000 range, an amount that remains competitive compared to schools of similar size, and would still be attractive to a man who had a base salary of $192,937.50 — more than $100,000 less — in his previous presidential position.

CMU needs to reassess where its priorities lie. It needs to refocus on what it takes to provide students with an all-around quality campus life.

That starts with great professors and great students who are given the opportunity to succeed.

 
 
  • Lloyd Duke

    The Board of Trustees and Mr. Ross should lead by example and allot him a lower base salary. CMU is suffering budget woes and $400,000/year is too much when we can’t even keep our computer labs open 24/7 anymore. Every cent counts and Mr. Ross should take the lead and show that EVERYONE is cutting back.

  • Jill

    I agree cut backs should be made EVERYWHERE but no he gets an increase. Most people in this town don’t make 47 grand but that is the increase while the rest of departments have to suffer. COMPLETE RIDICULOUS! Shame on The Board of Trustees with no common sense just proves how greedy the big shots at central are.

  • Buddha

    If the school can afford to repaint already decently painted buildings and put TVs everywhere advertising how the cafeterias went green, they can afford giving a nice salary. They only closed the computer labs because the people using them during late times were gamers playing World of Warcraft.

  • 912

    So CMU officials use the lame “everybody else is doing it” excuse for this outrageous salary. (It’s the type of excuse we’d never accept from a 10-year-old.) They claim it’s impossible to attract top talent for a mere, say, $200,000.

    I wish they’d break the mold and bring in someone who would work for that “paltry” sum. They might find he is actually interested more in the long-term interest of CMU than in enriching himself.

  • Nikki Sics

    It will be fun to watch the usual games ensue, when faculty starts talks for a new contract following yet another year of “unavoidable” tuition hikes. Money magically appears when it comes time to hire administrators or start up money-pit building projects, but everyone *else* has to tighten their belts. We see computer labs shorten their hours, writing and math centers cut, and all departments tasked with trimming the fat from skeletons. Good thing students don’t need that stuff. I’m limping toward graduation with a pile of student loans, having lost two faculty advisers to better schools over the past three years. I wonder what cool plans the new president will set in motion before heading out for greener pastures three years down the road?

  • AnAdjunct

    Absolutely right, Nikki. When some of my colleagues are making 23,000 a year and teaching four classes each semester, and the Writing Center and Computer labs are having to cut hours, you have to ask yourself what is the focus of this university? Is it hiring administrators and paying them obscene salaries in light of asking departments to cut their budgets by 3 to 9 percent, and superficially sprucing up the campus, or is it actually hiring good faculty and paying them a living wage. Is this a university that effectively meets students’ needs and expectations for their actual *education*, or is this AIG? Let them eat cake! Indeed.