Home » Voices » Columns »

Both parties standing in way of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal

 

What should have been a monumental and historic occasion was reduced to a political ploy for votes and ultimately failed, leaving a legal form of discrimination in place.

On Monday, a provision that would have led to the repeal of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” the military law that prevents gays and lesbians from serving openly failed to garner the 60 votes needed to block a Republican filibuster in the Senate.

While pundits from both sides will try and lay blame at one specific group, there is plenty of blame to go around here.

We can start with Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine. Collins, one of the most liberal members of the GOP Senate caucus, is a supporter of repealing the law but refused to vote for repeal in this case because of the Democrats’ refusal to allow any Republican amendments to the Defense Authorization Act that the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal motion was attached as an amendment to.

Nice to know that Collins would let petty political nonsense get in the way of her sense of right and wrong and a chance to be part of history, just to prove a point to the opposing party.

There’s plenty of blame to be laid at the feet of all 41 Senate Republicans who killed the measure, with special blame being landed at the feet of Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.

McCain, the 2008 GOP presidential nominee threatened to filibuster any repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” which would secure him a spot right next to the late Sen. Strom Thurmond and his 24-hour filibuster of the Civil Rights Act in 1957 as one of the most bigoted acts in Senate history.

There is plenty of blame for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. He failed to court his best chance for a Republican vote in Collins by flat-out refusing any Republican amendments to the bill.

The whole vote was an act of futility anyway. The wording of the motion said “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” would only be repealed if a study of all active military personnel stated that repeal would not hurt military morale, and that study had to be certified by the President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Mike Mullen.

The study has been ordered and is under way, so wouldn’t it be smart to just wait until it’s completed? It just proves that scoring political points is more important in Washington than not wasting time and money.

Since being signed into law in 1993, over 13,000 armed forces personnel have been discharged under “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” and at a time when the armed forces are stretched as thin as they ever have and national security is of the utmost importance, it is time to end a practice that discriminates against brave men and women who serve this country for only living their lives honestly.

 
 
  • Michmediaperson

    Joe: Harry Reid did not want this to pass. He did this to get the Gays in Nevada fired up to vote for him in five weeks. He’s in the fight of his life for re-election.

    If he really wanted this passed, all he had to do was have Susan Collins introduced a couple amendments…………the GOP would have debated it…………..the Dems would have voted no on the amendments……….Collins and a couple lefties would have voted to close debate………..and then the vote would have been 60……….to pass it.

    But, no. Harry Reid did this for politics. Pure and simple.

    Just like the Dream Act. He did this to get the illegals to vote in five weeks.

    I’m glad it lost. We need to keep “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”

    Let’s all hope Nevada votes out Harry Reid.

  • Wp121606

    lost in the senate’s failure to repeal and in the administration’s ineffectiveness is the FACT that gays and lesbians must sit in the back of the bus……..what a SHAME that their constitutional rights have become the whipping post of politicians.

  • Cvtheis55

    The problem with these bills are that congress seems incapable of keeping them simple and single-issue. Every one of these issues is lumped in with so many other things that it is virtually impossible to have a principled vote b/c there is usually 1 or 2 other things in the bill that any congresscritter will find objectionable. This is frequently by design so one party can point at the other and say 'see, they voted against X.' This is exactly why the tea party has gained so much traction – folks are sick of it.

  • Michmediaperson

    To Wp121606:

    The Democrats let your side down big time. They did it for election purposes. The Dems had the votes to pass it. With our conservatives leading in many of the November elections, it will be a long time before you see 59 or 60 Dems in the Senate. This thing will take years to pass now. No one to blame but the Dems.

  • Michmediaperson

    To Wp121606:

    The Democrats let your side down big time. They did it for election purposes. The Dems had the votes to pass it. With our conservatives leading in many of the November elections, it will be a long time before you see 59 or 60 Dems in the Senate. This thing will take years to pass now. No one to blame but the Dems.

  • Joe M.

    Okay, but with the Teabaggers you have no chance at all of getting DADT repealed. They'll vote against it all day, every day, based on nothing but bigotry. Which, by the way, is the only thing that can make republicans vote against a defense spending bill.

  • Joe M.

    Okay, but with the Teabaggers you have no chance at all of getting DADT repealed. They'll vote against it all day, every day, based on nothing but bigotry. Which, by the way, is the only thing that can make republicans vote against a defense spending bill.

  • Joe M.

    Why keep DODT, michmedia? What value does it have?

  • Joe M.

    Why keep DODT, michmedia? What value does it have?

  • ThinksYouAreSilly

    Why should it be kept? Gay men and women can shoot a gun as well as any straight man or woman (especially when there's return fire). As far as cohesion of the troops goes, if someone has a problem, they're the one that should leave anyway.

    But hey, I've always said DADT is my ticket out if there's a draft….so you have fun playing in the sand.

  • ThinksYouAreSilly

    Why should it be kept? Gay men and women can shoot a gun as well as any straight man or woman (especially when there's return fire). As far as cohesion of the troops goes, if someone has a problem, they're the one that should leave anyway.

    But hey, I've always said DADT is my ticket out if there's a draft….so you have fun playing in the sand.

  • Michmediaperson

    Joe, you're buying the Harry Reid and Democratic Party kool-aid.

    When Al Franken was sworn into the US Senate, the Liberal Democrats had the votes in the Senate and the House to pass it, plus socialist Barack Hussein Obama to sign the bill.

    They didn't do it. They didn't want to do it. They want to get people like worked up so you'll blame the Tea Party, George Bush, Ronald Reagan and anybody with an R next to their name. Your folks could have passed this last year. Even the other day, had they let Susan Collins have her sayso and the GOP's sayso, it would have passed the Senate.

    The Dems are using gays. The gay community should sit out this election and not vote Democratic.

    With us conservatives coming back into power, this bill won't pass for a long, long time.

    But, don't blame us….blame the liberal Democrats!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! They used the gays!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Is Glen Beck a terrorist?

    “The gay community should sit out this election and not vote Democratic.

    With us conservatives coming back into power, this bill won't pass for a long, long time.”
    They should sit out the election so the bigots who actively desire to oppress them gain power? Do explain how that does them any more good than harm. And explain why you “conservatives” aren't horrible for the continued oppression you forecast.

  • Is Glen Beck a terrorist?

    “This thing will take years to pass now. No one to blame but the Dems.”
    Really?

    “With us conservatives coming back into power, this bill won't pass for a long, long time.”
    No, not really.