University says FA wants $10 million over three-year deal

 

The university and Faculty Association cannot reach consensus on 17 items before signing their next three-year contract and have petitioned for fact finding.

Some of the key issues leading to disagreement are compensation, health benefits, recognition — who is included in the bargaining group — and tenure policy.

Mediation between the groups ended Thursday. Ray Christie, vice provost of academic administration, sent an email to employees Tuesday afternoon that said the university and FA were unable to make “meaningful progress” during mediation sessions.

The groups met three times for mediation; the FA contract expired June 30. The university has not extended the faculty contract, which it has done in years prior.

Laura Frey, FA president and professor of counseling and special education said Christie’s message was inaccurate and misleading.

“The update that was sent out … is a blatant attempt to circumvent the bargaining process,” Frey said. “That was sent out to the FA leadership and the community, with Ray Christie being a member of the bargaining team. The update includes inaccuracies and misleading characterizations of the FA position … it’s extremely frustrating that (he) as a member of the administration’s bargaining team has decided to release that information.”

Both sides have filed for fact finding, Frey said.

Disputed points

Fact finding is conducted by the state, said Ruthanne Okun, director of the Bureau of Employee Relations.

“Fact finding goes beyond mediation,” she said. “A third party looks at both sides and issues a recommendation. The parties then go back to bargaining based on that recommendation.”

Okun said the factfinder should be appointed within the week.

“In the recent proposal, the university has offered increases equal to 4 (percent) over a three-year contract,” Christie said. “Overall, however, the (FA) proposal would raise salaries by 9.8 (percent) … The total compensation — salary and related benefits — would increase the university’s base budget by approximately $10 million.”

According to the petition, the university proposes a freeze for 2011-12 and 1-percent increases plus a flat amount of $830 and $835 for 2012-13 and 2013-14, respectively.

The FA proposes a freeze for the fall semester 2011-12, a 1-percent-plus-$1,000 increase in the spring; in 2012-13, 1 percent plus $500 for fall, 1.5 percent plus $500 for the spring; in 2013-14, 1.25 percent plus $500 in the fall and 1.5 percent plus $500 in the spring.

The university proposes compensation at $1,470 per credit hour for summer courses and the FA wants to maintain current contract language with a $8,250 cap per course. The university wants the number contingent on FA acceptance of language on supplemental assignments.

Both groups agree on overload salary — $1,470 per credit hour, but the university also wants that number contingent on FA acceptance of language on supplemental assignments.

The university wants to maintain current health and prescription drug coverage rates until January 1, 2012. At that point, it wants to convert FA employees to the CMU plan “at rates paid for other benefit-eligible employees.”

Those rates include increases each year to the monthly contribution made by the university. Other CMU employees are covered under a Blue Cross Blue Shield plan with 91 percent of premiums covered, Christie said in the email.

The FA wants to maintain Michigan Education Special Services Association benefits at 95 percent with a 10/20 prescription card for all three years of the contract.

With dental coverage, the university is proposing the same CMU plan “at rates paid for other benefit eligible employees;” the FA wants 100 percent of a 100/50/50 plan.

The university’s factfinding petition said it wants to remove coaches, librarians and counselors hired after July 1, 2011 from the bargaining unit, as well as College of Medicine and CMU First Professional Degree faculty members.

The university wants to change the current reappointment, tenure and promotion policy.

CMU wants to “(strengthen) the quality requirement of application materials, (and) extend the time in rank from 4 to 5 years for professor salary adjustment,” while the FA wants to change the reappointment process in terms of number and timeline for applying.

The university also wants to change the language for salary adjustments for promotion and completion of terminal degrees.

Outside counsel hired

The university has hired Vercruysse Murray & Calzone, a law firm from Bingham Farms which specializes in labor and employment issues.

“These lawyers have experience in handling major negotiations, strikes, class action and complex litigation, non-competittion litigation, injunctions, union avoidance, organizaing unfair labor practices, arbitrations, ERISA litigation, OSHA, MDCR, DOL and EEOC complaints and all forms of employment litigation,” the firm’s website said.

Steve Smith, director of public relations, said the university solicits outside counsel for a number of things, though it does employ a general counsel, Manuel Rupe.

In a statement, Rupe said he recommended outside counsel in the matter of faculty negotiations. Rupe directed the university to the firm because of its expertise and prior success.

“CMU evaluates, for example, the law firm’s expertise in a particular area of the law, its prior success in representing CMU or other public universities in similar matters,” Rupe said.

Frey would not say if the FA had legal representation.

“We have an FA bargaining team that we have great confidence in and that includes our (Michigan Education Association) leadership,” she said.

 
 
  • geek

    If one looks at the number, 3.47% was the MAXIMUM CMU could have raised tuition for its students and stay under the state threshold to avoid additional cuts. This is because of the CMU Promise. The additional tuition raised from the increase in tuition when the graduating seniors are replaced by incoming freshman (from $304 to $358).

  • ipaidcmutuition

    BCBS  is good enough for WMU, EMU, and MSU faculty.  Why not CMU?  I pay $665 a month as an individual policy holder with Blue Cross.  I don’t have any sympathy for Central’s faculty on the health care issue.

  • Zeno

    Many of those institutions rely on a BCBS administered by Messa (just as CMU faculty currently have).  The big difference with CMU’s BCBS plan is that they do not cover as much as the Messa plan.  Plus, no other Michigan university uses its percentage based prescription plan (not a flat fee).  So please get your facts straight before posting.  This is a very, very serious issue that is putting the future of CMU at risk, degrading the quality of life of faculty families, and hurting students (because no faculty member in their right mind would come to CMU if this deal went through).

  • Palen Dave

    Clearly the union for this campus is out of touch.  It appears they reject a health insurance plan where the employees only pay 9% of the cost?  Hello?  Most private sector employees pay at least 25%. 

  • concerned

    Ten million dollars sounds like a lot, but keep in mind that another article right here talks about ONE med school prof who will earn nearly half a million dollars in three years.  And that’s just ONE prof.  The administration has no trouble finding big bucks for its pet project, but pleads poverty when it comes to offering competitive salaries for the core faculty who teach the courses that most CMU students (those not in the so-far-non-existent med school) take.

  • Logical Chip

    Give me a break!  These state employees (paid for by our tax dollars and tuition) need to give up the whining about having to contribute to health care costs.  No more $2, or $5, or $10 flat fee co-pay for prescription drugs.  The workers in the private sector who pay for these salaries do not get the same sweetheart deal.  Wow, it would be horrible if this degrades the life of faculty families to the point at which they cannot make ends meet on $75K+ a year in Mount Pleasant!  The percent based plan is good enough for the CMU staff and the rest of us.  Do you seriously think that any faculty member who is offered a job in this economy will turn it down solely on the basis of a prescription drug co-pay?  I think not.