Home » Voices » Columns »

COLUMN: New keg law to effectively kill all Michigan parties

 

Three weeks after the new keg law has taken effect, I would like to be the first to extend my hand in congratulations to the Michigan lawmakers and police.

For anyone unaware, the new addition to the musty tome of Michigan law requires retailers to tag every keg sold with the purchaser’s name, address, phone number, social security number, criminal history and medical history, so when the cavalry busts up a party of delinquents having a good time, the cops can identify the monster who bought the booze.

With the passage of the new law, our legislators have finally earned their franking privileges and come to a cognizant agreement on an issue more important than pork, casework or dreams of gerrymandering: they’ve decided to crack down on broke college students bemoaning cuts to higher education and drowning their sorrows in sweet keg beer by giving the cops a chance to say, “Buck up, chump. A court date for the friend whose name is on this tag will sure teach your conscience a lesson.”

I applaud the foresight of the Michigan Congress in seeing there is no better teacher than fear and guilt. The theory, of course, is the terror of landing a friend in trouble and the remorse felt once that friend has been slapped with a hefty fine will ward against impropriety and make upstanding citizens of us all.

We can’t fight terrorism when we’re drunk and we can’t apply for a job holding a plastic red cup. Our elected officials have once again shown they’re in it for the long term by making it easy for the underage to start doing things more productive, like contributing money to a political campaign.

So lawmakers will no doubt squawk with delight when they learn that not one party has taken place since Nov. 1, the day the law went into effect.

In fact, just last Saturday night I found my roommate, normally a ruthless partier, excessive drinker and therefore terrible person, in his room at his desk diligently calculating the limit of an equation. He doesn’t even have math this semester.

Surprised, I asked him about the sudden change of behavior. Surely on a Saturday night he should be bonging Keystone, getting into fights and chasing after women — keg law or no keg law.

Without missing a beat he said, “Well, once our lawmakers made it illegal, I just knew there had to be something wrong with going to parties.”

There was twinkle in his eye and a strain in his voice as he spoke. “Why would they outlaw it if it wasn’t morally wrong? Everyone knows, after all, that our legislators know best.”

He added genuinely, “Thank God for the Michigan Congress.”

 
 
  • Anonymous

    Effectively kill all Michigan parties? Doubtful. There are 21+ year olds who purchase kegs for 21+ year olds to drink at parties too you know.

  • Anon

    I love how thinking that being able to track underage drinking magically equates to a decrease in drunk driving. Where are the laws that actually teach people how to imbibe responsibly so that we can actually address the problem?

  • Gemose

    I think he was being scarcastic with most of this article/

  • Thall2

    How is it that my 19 year old son is old enough to carry a gun, and be flown half way around the world to be killed for this country? Check the stats of people who have killed someone because of drunk driving, very few are under the age of 21. Michigan legislature, do not care about young people, Michigan’s broke as well as an insurance state, this is another way for them to make money. And who is the state of Michigan to tell anyone what is moral. If the state of Michigan was so worried about morality, they would have found a way to keep auto companies in the state, and to keep people in the state working. They need to leave these kids alone, and start working on some real pressing issues, like jobs.

  • Good News Everybody!

    Great job….jungle juice parties will be the alternative.  Push them towards hard liquor *slow clap*

  • Michmediaperson

    Carry a gun?—–That’s called the Second Amendment!!!  Constitutional right!!!

    More people in this country are killed every year in drunk driving than soldiers do globally.

    People under 35 can’t be President per the Constitution.  Illegals can’t be President.

    So, what’s your beef??

  • Newpo1nc

    please provide a link to said stats that show that very few of them are under the age of 21

  • Michmediaperson

    I have to get into another meeting but I looked this up.

    According to the Center for Disease Control (CDC)

    Among drivers with a BAC level of .08% or higher involved in fatal crashes in 2009,
    a whopping one-third of them were between the ages of 21 and 24.

    Looks like the Michigan Republicans did the right thing!  I didn’t realize it was that high

  • Michigan Legislature?

    When did Michigan establish a Congress?

  • GUEST

    I am always amazed that so many people read these articles online.  It seems like most people who comment on these articles are taking them way too serious and use these opportunities to try and showcase their “intelligence.” 

  • student

    Bottom line is if you are dumb enough to drive after drinking from a keg, you are dumb enough to drive after drinking out of anything else. Nothing will change in terms of drunk driving.

  • Jordan 09

    this is excellent satire. michmediaperson needs to get a life.

  • Goaheadandspammyass

    This law surely will make “legal adults” think twice before providing a whole keg of alcohol to minors. Having said that, I think it is ignorant to think that this will prevent an age old ritual.  Drinking alcohol to excess for entertainment has long been a perogative of the 18ish to 25 ish crowd. I agree with the other reader who observes that providing a lot of “beer” to minors is now too risky, while providing a few half gallons of “liquor” remains an anonymous and a non traceable offense. This law does nothing but satisy lawyers and insurance companies who are looking to sink their fangs into a citizen every time another breaks a toenail. “Underage drinking” at 18yrs + is a joke. Imagine being old enough to be pressed into military service to die for others beliefs by the same government who finds you not responsible enough to drink alcohol. I MOURN the loss of individual responsibility.  Punish the DRINKER!  Not the keg, the tap, the cup or the ping pong balls.

  • Stron2am

    Are you suggesting that there SHOULDN’T be consequences and accountability for providing alcohol to minors? There are certainly parties that will suffer in the “fun” department because of this law… but there are also “legal adults” that will think twice and opt not to buy for minors as a result. Therefore, there will be less minors that drink. It can be reasonably inferred that less minors that drink will yield less minors with alcohol-related maladies (alcohol poisoning, automobile accidents, etc.) and therefore, less dead and injured minors.

    How many parties are worth a life? One? Two? One hundred? I am of the opinion that the a human life outweighs inebriated hi-jinks any day of the week.