Home / Top Stories /
Faculty separations remain consistent despite tumultuous year, ratified contract
By Alayna Smith on October 15, 2012 6:00 am / 1 comment
Data shows the number of faculty who left Central Michigan University during the 2011-12 academic year remained consistent despite turmoil between the Faculty Association and the administration.
There were 40 total faculty separations. This includes 20 retirements, 17 resignations and three cases of denied tenure and non-reappointment.
These numbers are consistent with previous years.
In 2010-11, there were 37 total faculty separations from the university: 18 retirements, 14 resignations, two non-reappointments and one death. There were similar numbers in 2009-10 with 17 retirements, 20 resignations, one discharge, one death, six non-reappointments and two who did not return from leave, making a total of 43 separations.
Matt Serra, director of faculty personnel services, said Friday he did not think last year’s contract negotiations affected the number of faculty separations or hires for this year.
“I have no knowledge of any such claims and cannot comment on what appears to be speculation,” he said. “… Based on the data, it does not appear to have had any effect.”
Serra said departments employ various methods to attract and maintain faculty members.
“After hiring a new faculty member, the department, college and university make every effort to create an environment in which he/she can be successful,” Serra said. “This includes providing resources, guidance and, in some cases, direct mentorship.”
Faculty members voiced their concerns about the tense relationship with the administration and were uncertain of the future, Central Michigan Life reported in January.
Sociology Department Chairwoman Brigitte Bechtold told CM Life in January she didn’t think the contract was a good compromise.
“I am disappointed by the outcome,” she said. “I don’t think this is a good contract. I think that faculty and administration relationships still have a lot of issues, and the contract is only one of several.”
James Hill, a professor of political science, told CM Life previously he felt the relationship between the FA and administration was severely damaged.
“The wounds are very deep,” Hill said. “This will take some positive outreach to the faculty by the administration to begin what I think will be a long healing process.”
Like us on Facebook
Recent Comments
- CE: Another 3-9 season, and both Enos and Heeke have to go! …
- Andy Villemure: I am looking for a KZ 900 block Z1E, that has not cracks tha…
- anonymous: Totally disagree on Heeke. Think he showed some real balls i…
- Amy Easton: Please let me know your lessons learned, how you organized t…
- Pete: I thought Central won a bowl game this year??? The program …
AD LINKS
• Is your baby graduating CMU? Place a personal greeting and photo in CM Life's Baby Graduates special pages. Download the form here
• Contact local movers in Mount Pleasant to help with all of your moving needs.
• Download Campus Cash Coupons!
• Search for local apartments
• Add your link here





1 Comment
If faculty and/or administration (or CMLife editors!?) were really interested in faculty separations they would try to assemble data addressing WHY faculty resign, not merely comment on the number of separations. For example, are the faculty who leave tenured or not yet tenured? Tenure is hard to achieve and it would be telling if the preponderance of resignations came from those faculty who had already gone through that onerous process. Also, if tenured faculty are leaving, are they finding tenured positions elsewhere; or, are they accepting the challenge of going through the tenure review all over again elsewhere. If the latter, that might very well indicate a level of faculty frustration with CMU that administrators would hopefully want to redress. Are faculty finding other positions at more prestigious universities, or comparable ones (or, do they leave academe entirely)? If the first, then CMU is losing its “best and brightest.” Regardless, are the faculty who resign those whom CMU tried to retain, by offering a similar compensation/resources package to that of the competing school? If faculty won’t stay at CMU for reward structures equivalent to those found elsewhere, then some factor surely is causing their departure; and CMU ought to want to find out what that (those factor(s) is. But my sense is that the data that would help answer these questions do not exist, because no one has tried to collect and collate them. So, for now, all we know is that faculty come; some go. But most stay. Perhaps CMLife might run an article about all the reasons most faculty choose to stay at CMU once they arrive. One answer likely would be that while there are some frustrations to being a faculty member at CMU, there are more than a few compensations.