Home / News / Student Life /
President Ross: Conversation about academic calendar ‘has to come back to the table’
By Ryan Fitzmaurice on October 24, 2012 8:00 am / 3 comments
Central Michigan University President George Ross said the discussion of the new academic calendar has to come back to the forefront of the Academic Senate.
In a meeting with Central Michigan Life Tuesday, Ross said with Monday’s SGA’s opposition to the academic calendar, A-Senate has to recognize the concerns students have regarding the change.
“The voice of the students is extremely important,” Ross said. “… What happened last night with the (SGA) House and Senate was a loud voice.”
Monday night, the SGA House voted unanimously to approve a motion declaring official opposition to the planned academic calendar changes.
The SGA Senate also voted to oppose the academic calendar, with 15 for the motion, two against and one abstaining.
Under the change, the fall 2014 semester would begin on Sept. 2, after Labor Day, effectively eliminating one week of structured class time.
Ross said he agreed with SGA’s expressed concerns presented in the passed bill.
“I don’t believe we have done enough homework,” Ross said. “Having a longer summer to work has, of course, been presented as a positive, but what are you going to do about orientation and Leadership Safari?”
Ross also expressed concerns that have been brought to him regarding room and board and whether student fees would change due to the new academic calendar.
Yet, Ross admitted the fate of the academic calendar was beyond his or SGA’s control.
“I’d love to tell you there was a person who could directly change the academic calendar,” Ross said. “I don’t have that authority, the provost doesn’t have that authority. This was voted in by the Academic Senate and negotiated with the Faculty Association. We are now prepared to follow the rules of bargaining.”
While Ross said SGA’s voice is an extremely important voice, he said it is limited in it’s ability to prevent the changes from happening because the academic calendar is a contractual issue between the Faculty Association and university.
“Part of the discussion, procedurally, is what we can do from here,” Ross said. “There are established paths that we can take.”
Ross said he is planning to meet with A-Senate’s executive board to discuss the future of the academic calendar and how the university plans to proceed now that the SGA legislation has passed.
Ross also plans to discuss the issue in detail with SGA President and Macomb junior Justin Gawronski this weekend.
Ross hopes A-Senate recognizes the urgency of the issue and doesn’t let procedural norms prevent continued discussion about the academic calender.
“I’m going to talk to the e-board and tell them we have to bring this back,” Ross said. ”I don’t want Robert’s Rules of Order to get in the way of this conversation.”
Like us on Facebook
Recent Comments
- bridesmaids: Very good info. Lucky me I recently found your blog by chanc…
- 66Chip: I certainly agree with the purpose of CCAP, which states tha…
- josh: I'm looking for a 98 to 2006 Suzuki katana frame with clean …
- Sherryl Morris: Hi, I am looking for a gas tank that may fit a 1980 Yamaha S…
- : Judge yourself first. …
AD LINKS
• Is your baby graduating CMU? Place a personal greeting and photo in CM Life's Baby Graduates special pages. Download the form here
• Contact local movers in Mount Pleasant to help with all of your moving needs.
• Download Campus Cash Coupons!
• Search for local apartments
• Add your link here





3 Comments
Thanks President Ross, for hearing the students’ voice
Ross’ willingness to lobby the Academic Senate Exec. Board toward
further discussion of this calendar issue is laudable. More noteworthy,
however, is his avoidance of discussion with the CMLife reporter (or
the reporter’s failure of reporting) about possible collective
bargaining outcomes. This news report makes it seem like the bargaining
between the FA and CMU administration will result in a new calendar.
That’s not so! Just read the collective bargaining
agreement if you think otherwise.
If CMU (e.g., Ross, who can control the administration bargaining, if he
wants to) is opposed to the new calendar, then it (Ross) can decide
in bargaining not to agree to a change. Of course, if the FA is in
favor of the change, this approach is likely to exacerbate existing
tensions between administration and faculty. So Ross clearly wants the
Senate to change its view. On the other hand, if the FA is willing to
listen to students, then it can bring its own proposal opposing a change
to the bargaining table. In effect, either the FA or the
administration, if either wanted to, now could effect the outcome the
students want without
the issue going back to the Senate.
This presidential mindset is what will make CMU thrive, for many years to come. I am proud to be a Chippewa! Fire Up Chips!