Home / News / Student Life /
CMU students weigh in on online piracy
By Megan Pacer on March 13, 2013 7:00 am / 2 comments
Even with legislation being presented to Congress that would halt online piracy of music and film, both the music industry and students at Central Michigan University are beginning to see its potential benefit.
“I feel that downloading music and movies without paying for it can be a problem, circumstantially,” sophomore Mary Menter said. “However, I think that the music industry does fine because the tours that music stars do bring in millions of dollars alone.”
Since tours seem to account for a substantial amount of the income for record companies, the Dearborn native said, the film industry might see a lot more damage due to online piracy than does the music industry.
Physical music sales dropped 12.8 percent in 2012, the Huffington Post reported.
Other music businesses have come out with similar reports and falling numbers, and the piracy debate has continued to rage on. Legislation such as the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and Protect IP Act (PIPA) have been introduced to Congress in an attempt to deter the amount of illegal online sharing that is going on in the United States.
“It’s boring talking about piracy, but it is the problem and we can’t avoid it,” John Kennedy, chief executive of International Federation of the Phonographic Industry, told the New York Times in 2010.
What businesses in the music industry are beginning to find, however, is that reports of online sharing can actually help companies that wish to target audiences and choose profitable artists and locations for tours.
Students at CMU are echoing the idea that online piracy, while hurtful to the music and film industries, can be made useful rather than stopped.
Sophomore Ben Brennick agreed that online piracy is a major problem, but focused on the fact that media industries have the opportunity to capitalize on the results of online sharing.
“The music, movie and game industries can use online file sharing to help promote their products by allowing downloads of trials of their products,” the Stanwood native said.
Brennick did advocate for stricter control of what material reaches the internet, and how, emphasizing that these trials ought to have limited uses.
Other students are more optimistic about online file sharing, emphasizing the great convenience it tends to offer. Tyler Kus said the ability to share music and film online is a great thing in our society today.
“I believe that the music industry … wants us to believe that downloading illegally does in fact hurt the economy,” the Farmington Hills sophomore said. “Honestly, I don’t think it does. If an artist’s music is good enough and they have a good enough fan base, they’re still going to make money.”
Echoing Menter’s point about tours and the outcome of fans, Kus thinks the music and film industries will be fine as long as that source of revenue stays intact.
“True fans will always go see the movie or go to the concert if they really love the music or film,” he said.
What every student seemed to agree on was the fact that online piracy is not something that will go away any time soon. Even for those like freshman Sarah Rich, who say they do not have strong opinions about online sharing, it is still obvious that it is a major part of our society.
“I don’t really have an opinion one way or the other,” the Rochester Hills sophomore said. “I know a lot of people do it and it doesn’t change the way that I look at them.”
Other students seemed to agree, expressing doubts about the new bills proposed to Congress.
“I don’t believe the legislation will realistically make it through Congress,” Menter said. “Overall, I don’t think it is something that is going to be stopped that easily.”
Like us on Facebook
Recent Comments
- xe yamaha,xe may yamaha,xe máy yamaha,yamaha,gia xe yamaha,giá xe Yamaha,tim xe may Yamaha: Very great post. I simply stumbled upon your blog and wished…
- Samantha: Go Kirsten!!!! U are my mentor and I hope u will come back t…
- Hannah McCalister: I disagree with your statement. This was a great article and…
- Jason: Maybe it's just me, but I've never done anything this shorts…
- : no, this girl is insane. i went to high school with her. she…
AD LINKS
• Is your baby graduating CMU? Place a personal greeting and photo in CM Life's Baby Graduates special pages. Download the form here
• Contact local movers in Mount Pleasant to help with all of your moving needs.
• Download Campus Cash Coupons!
• Search for local apartments
• Add your link here





2 Comments
Distributing copyrighted material on BitTorrent, uTorrent, Vuze or Frostwire is against United States Federal law. In the US, the copyright owner has the exclusive right to determine who may distribute their copyrighted material under US Federal law 17 USC 106.
17 USC § 106 – Exclusive rights in copyrighted works
Subject to sections 107 through 122, the owner of copyright under this title has the exclusive rights to do and to authorize any of the following:
(1) to reproduce the copyrighted work in copies or phonorecords;
(2) to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work;
(3) to distribute copies or phonorecords of the copyrighted work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending;
Using “filesharing” software like BitTorrent, Vuze or Frostwire violates two elements of this law because it both copies and distributes files. If you record a song, or make a movie that you own and control, you can “share” it with BitTorrent, Vuze or Frostwire and there is no problem. You cannot “share” music and movies that you do not have the rights to share.
If you do so, you have opened yourself up to the threat of lawsuit. Two hundred thousand people have been sued for “sharing” copyrighted material on the internet without permission since 2010.
Your getting paid to post these things. Anyone can click on your name and confirm this as a fact.
At least have the ethics to change your name from “EthicalFan” to “Paid-Shill”