Quantcast Central Michigan Life
College Media Network

Our Readers Voice

Mount Pleasant drinking water

Issue date: 3/14/08 Section: Voices
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1
It was a sorry day in November 2005 when a handful of voters listened to certain (misinformed) professionals who were appointed by our government to promote water fluoridation.

Christopher Bryson, author of "The Fluoride Deception," did a ten-year study of this issue. He interviewed Edward Bernay, spinmaster of the century who was hired by our government to sell the idea that fluoride would prevent tooth decay. Bernays said that if you can get the folks in the "white coats" to endorse anything, it will sell.

It was a local physician who convinced the Jaycees to "get out the vote" to defeat the proposed ordinance to prohibit fluoridation back in November 1956. The vote was very close and did not require the city to start fluoridation, but they did it anyway.

We should be thankful for the scientists at the Environmental Protection Agency who continue to expose the fraudulent actions of the various government agencies including the EPA , CDC and U.S.Health Dept.

Declassified documents show that original evidence about fluoride being safe for human consumption in low doses was actually generated by Manhattan Project scientists in the 1940s. Fluoride was a key element in the atomic bomb project.

Millions of pounds of fluoride were used by DuPont's chemical plant, whose emissions produced the first lawsuits against the U.S. government when World War II ended. An attempt to counteract local fear of fluoride, lectures of flouride toxicology and the usefulness of flouride in tooth health were given to the nation.

Fluoride was first added to Newburgh, N.Y. In a classified operation code named "Program F" blood and tissue samples from Newburgh citizens were examined.

Why does this experiment continue? Because many industries have fluoride in their waste products, so instead of having to pay big money to dispose of it in a disposal place, they make money by selling their waste to cities to prevent tooth decay. After all, the government says, "Fluoride is safe and prevents tooth decay."

Isn't it time that people of conscience look into this issue and decide if Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) scientists are speaking the truth? As of August 2005, 7,000 EPA scientists are calling for a moratorium on fluoridation.

Gladys Mitchell

Mount Pleasant Citizens For Safe Drinking Wate
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 2 of 2

NYSCOF

posted 3/14/08 @ 7:17 AM EST

Gladys is so right!!!

The reason EPA scientists, along with 1,500 professionals, urge the end of fluoridation is because science shows adding fluoride chemicals into the drinking water to reduce tooth decay is ineffective and harmful to health. (Continued…)

nyscof

NYSCOF

posted 3/14/08 @ 7:19 AM EST

Gladys is so right!!!

The reason EPA scientists, along with 1,500 professionals, urge the end of fluoridation is because science shows adding fluoride chemicals into the drinking water to reduce tooth decay is ineffective and harmful to health. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement


Local Advertisements

Poll

What are the impacts of Proposal 1?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement