2008 Woodie Awards
Enforce the rules
Issue date: 4/4/08 Section: Editorial
It's 25 feet.
That's just a few more paces away from entrances. Walking through smoke is not the worst thing in the world, but it's rude (and scientifically dangerous) to smoke in front of entrances to academic buildings. Smokers can back up a few feet; non-smokers can't get farther away from the smokers who light up too close.
The rules have been in place for years and smokers haven't seriously challenged the 25-foot limit, so they shouldn't be surprised if the rule is enforced.
It's not about rights; it's about courtesy. It's the same reason people shouldn't talk on cell phones in class, because others paid equally good money for the chance to be in class. It's the same reason people wear headphones, because others might think your music sucks.
Some people, believe it or not, go to lengths to not smoke. They think smoking is dangerous - because it is. While smokers are willing to pay the monetary and health costs, non-smokers never consented to the price and shouldn't be obligated to incur even the slight risks of walking through a group of smokers on their way to Anspach Hall or any campus building. There is the courtesy element, but the health risk justifies the fines.
Look at it another way: Banning smoking is catching on like, well, wildfire. There are certainly parents and even potential students who would pass on CMU for one of the other Michigan universities where smoking isn't as blatant.
A 2007 study of Purdue students found that they smoked far more during average school weeks than during finals, so smoking can't be necessary for achieving scholarly success or dealing with college stress.
Enforcing the 25-foot rule is cheap (the $100 fines would more than pay for whoever ends up regulating the rule) and will have non-medical benefits.
It does not hamper smokers' rights anymore than banning smoking in buildings does - there aren't very many places on campus where a smoker can't walk 25 feet to get their fix. We're not aware of any contractual obligation to allow CMU employees or students to have enough time to leisurely smoke an entire cig.
The only remaining question is who will enforce this. CMU Police currently are unable or unwilling to enforce existing campus regulations, so the onus should fall on the Office of Student Life. The OSL has experience pursuing alcohol and drug violations in the dorms, just send someone out at random intervals with a camera, and after catching someone twice, give him or her a ticket. We're sure you'll catch more than one person an hour.
Several attempts at enforcement will get the word out.
Enforcement is cheap, it will help recruitment and it will make non-smokers breathe easy. Smokers: just back off a few feet to keep those nicotine-starved pedestrians happy.
That's just a few more paces away from entrances. Walking through smoke is not the worst thing in the world, but it's rude (and scientifically dangerous) to smoke in front of entrances to academic buildings. Smokers can back up a few feet; non-smokers can't get farther away from the smokers who light up too close.
The rules have been in place for years and smokers haven't seriously challenged the 25-foot limit, so they shouldn't be surprised if the rule is enforced.
It's not about rights; it's about courtesy. It's the same reason people shouldn't talk on cell phones in class, because others paid equally good money for the chance to be in class. It's the same reason people wear headphones, because others might think your music sucks.
Some people, believe it or not, go to lengths to not smoke. They think smoking is dangerous - because it is. While smokers are willing to pay the monetary and health costs, non-smokers never consented to the price and shouldn't be obligated to incur even the slight risks of walking through a group of smokers on their way to Anspach Hall or any campus building. There is the courtesy element, but the health risk justifies the fines.
Look at it another way: Banning smoking is catching on like, well, wildfire. There are certainly parents and even potential students who would pass on CMU for one of the other Michigan universities where smoking isn't as blatant.
A 2007 study of Purdue students found that they smoked far more during average school weeks than during finals, so smoking can't be necessary for achieving scholarly success or dealing with college stress.
Enforcing the 25-foot rule is cheap (the $100 fines would more than pay for whoever ends up regulating the rule) and will have non-medical benefits.
It does not hamper smokers' rights anymore than banning smoking in buildings does - there aren't very many places on campus where a smoker can't walk 25 feet to get their fix. We're not aware of any contractual obligation to allow CMU employees or students to have enough time to leisurely smoke an entire cig.
The only remaining question is who will enforce this. CMU Police currently are unable or unwilling to enforce existing campus regulations, so the onus should fall on the Office of Student Life. The OSL has experience pursuing alcohol and drug violations in the dorms, just send someone out at random intervals with a camera, and after catching someone twice, give him or her a ticket. We're sure you'll catch more than one person an hour.
Several attempts at enforcement will get the word out.
Enforcement is cheap, it will help recruitment and it will make non-smokers breathe easy. Smokers: just back off a few feet to keep those nicotine-starved pedestrians happy.
Viewing Comments 1 - 6 of 11
Gregory
posted 4/04/08 @ 1:25 AM EST
Yes, This just what we need at CMU. The Smoking Police on the prowl throughout CMU just like the SS storming through the night. Sounds like the Smoke Nazis are at it again. (Continued…)
Craig Crosswait
posted 4/06/08 @ 7:50 AM EST
Okay this is for whoever wrote this editorial, "CMU Alumna, Class '78", and everyone else who has this common misconception. Okay now stay with me because I know this is going to be hard for you all to understand. (Continued…)
Republican Ranting
posted 4/06/08 @ 12:20 PM EST
I don't think there should be smoking at all on campus - it's annoying to walk through clouds of smoke when I walk - it smells.
Do it in your car or go to a private bar - there's no government given right to smoke. (Continued…)
2007 Alumn
posted 4/06/08 @ 12:36 PM EST
This whole thing is stupid.
It's like the time I got kicked out of a bar because I had drank too much and was puking on people. HELLO! It was my choice to drink, sorry I couldn't stop that from effecting people around me. (Continued…)
Melissa
posted 4/07/08 @ 10:55 AM EST
I'm a non-smoker, so you probably know where I'm going with this . . .
It's my choice not to smoke, just as it is your choice to smoke. I don't have anything against smokers, I just don't like being around it. (Continued…)
Eric
posted 4/07/08 @ 12:29 PM EST
Second hand smoke isn't the issue - its rude and obnoxious to force people to navigate through mobs congregated around the doorways! This goes for smokers, or inconsiderate boobs who decide to stop and chat right in the middle of the main walkways. (Continued…)
Post a Comment